Links to the Left. The First amendment to the 8th

Fascism is a religion of state.  It assumes the organic unity of the body politic. It longs for national leader of the state attuned to the will of the people. It is totalitarian in that it holds all things political and that the state is justified in setting rules to achive the common good. It takes responsibility for all aspects of life including our health and well being.  And seeks to impose uniformity in thought and action weather by force or by social regulation and pressure.  Everything weather the economy or religion must be aligned with the state.  [things or thoughts not in line are the enemy].   Paraphrased from Jonah Goldberg.

Left thought often finds themselves useing  tenets of fascism.    I have heard atheisits and the left wing called their own religion.   I have found dogma among the commentists of various blogs and the charge has the ring of truth.    They have fed me outright lies and twisted what I considered to be the truth.    The reason some call the dogma of the far left a relgion is because there is the implyed argument that the left’s ideas are religion in government and a enforced version at that and hence banned by the First amendment.

Every thing from Mcdonalds to Guns to Sex to Marrigage to Driveing to prayer to non christain religions to public welfare is the rightfull provence of the government.   Indead many of the above are mentioned are issues that states can regulate. All are claimed to be the Provice of the government of the National level by vertue of national trade.      Is it any wonder that people on the right feel oppressed when our debt through the United States is 10 trillion. And our debt to our 65 year olds or older is 54 trillion.   Our roads and brigdes get neglected with our congress building pork projects to distract their constiuents.   Oppresive debt and we are banned from suggesting public prayer or privite prayer in schools.   No moment of silence is allowed.   And our leader has said no child left behind.   If morality can not be refered to as a motivation to follow the rules of school then they are abitrary,  respect for others dies and anarchy in our schools reigns.  This is how our government leaves our students behind.    In history  I never studied the arguments of the founding fathers.

I feel forced in schools toward anti captialists and that the leaders of the founders of this country arn’t to be emulated.   They point out the bad of the time with the good of our time.   By social pressure I am almost force into government care because I am not rich and the corperation and citezens feel that the government has my back.     There are polictical correctness terms that define things that I don’t believe in because we must not offend.   It has made the underclass more senistive to insults.   That is political correctness and while they are defineing things they define away my right to freedom.   Are we allowed to learn from our mistakes or does the government think to take away my pain.  Say if I got a loan for a house.

Things need to change, we need hope becasuse this country has none and the government with Obama at its head is our leader because he is responsive to you, he is not some old guy with oud policies.    Except he has old policies.  If I am the enemy of him I am the enemy of racsial unity or I am the enemy of the health and welfare of 40 million uninsured Americans.   I am the enemy of prosperity.

I am the enemy of the envirorment because I want freedom of the oil from the middle east and so I want to drill in alaska and off our costs and thus overthrow those short sighted envirormental laws. I am the enemy of plesent sights.     Even though doing so would throw countless jobs right now into our econonmy not ten years from now when solar comes into effiency and another 10 after that.   And billions of dollars flow to exxon who would spend that on people steel and healthcare.

I am the enemy of deversity because I want imgrants from Mexico to enter our country in numbers comparable to ellis island legally, not illegally and thus have people use them at substandard wages.

What will Obama say about people like me.   I am not the enemy.  Obama is not enemy.  But labeling me and forceing me to pay for things and hop to government laws that are not needed for the government to run and protect us military.

Rather I am the facist for wanting Iraq to have those freedoms we have,  I am imposing american will on Iraq for Oil.  Yet  we did not force our freedoms on them.   They still have sharia law.  But they choose.    Are we imperalist facists the right expanding through war.  NO we have not.  But we are accused.

I supported Iraq before we invaded because  I heard no reason that we should not go in.  No Cost anlyisis.   I heard about WMD’s.   I beleive that the president and his staff  honestly believe that Sadham had Urianium, mustard gas, and nerve gas.  I never cared what system of government  Iraq had, except that we had put in Sadaam and he had to go if we could do it.   He was a brutal force and torturer of the innocent.   I support Iraq now because the war hasn’t weekend our position in the world,   Iraq is improved.   The world mainly has forgotton Iraq because the press has.

I am the enemy of the Globe.  We destroy the world with CO2.    No the science is not settled,  real life data has debunked old Warming warnings.   yet all of us might yet be expected to bow to the EPA as laws get tighter and tighter.  Not even our need for quick energy can break this type of interference with our captialist system.    Most of the US is locked away and the companies have the leftovers to meet out needs and it can’t do it so we buy from our enemies.

give and take

“In turn, a strong business climate depends on government’s ability to give…”  From a Boston media outlet.  To take it futher “a climate that depends on government  depends on their ablity to take.”
Business has an overhead.   Government has an overhead.  Why should a business have two overheads?   Why should the government take our money?  There are reasons for taxes but is  helping businesses one of them.  If you help businesses can I start a businesses and get help?   Are not citizens required to be treated equal under the law?  Giveing our households two overheads.  If this effects how many employees a business can have does the government now regulate how many children we can have?  If governments gets involved with where an animal or plant or insect.  Is our household involed?  If the government has special intrests then what about our intrests.

If every government that got involved with a really big government spending wise had at least 15% idle people. (Jobless)  What does that do to a business profit margin, don’t they use that margin to increace market share through persuasion?

The federal government is stepping on ‘we the people’ to help business. To help the bank out is to help one of us and not the other.

Small government is better.

Ah Really?

CONSERVATIVE POLICIES AND HOW THEY HURT YOU AND MOST AMERICANS (part one)Questioning Your Morality. Conservatives think you’re too immoral to make decisions about your own sex life. They try to pass laws that block people’s access to birth control and sex education, even though it is very clear that the more access people have, the fewer unwanted pregnancies and cases of sexually-transmitted diseases in our country. The conservative solution to these problems is to tell people not to have sex until marriage. Unfortunately, this solution is not working and never has. Thanks to such ineffective policies, America has the highest rate of unwanted pregnancy and STDs in the developed world.Sending the Little Guy to War. Conservatives like to claim the wars they start are fought for good reasons, like freedom and democracy. In reality, rich people get politicians to start wars to gain better access to the resources of other nations (like farmland or oil), or to profit from selling weapons to the government. Of course, most politicians are wealthy elites who would never think of putting themselves at risk by joining the military – out of all members of congress, only a few have children in the military. It’s everyday working people who join the military so they can have a career or pay for college.

By: Brian on January 31st, 2008 at 9:08 pm

Hey Brian your comment to ForMyKountry.com inspired this response. Am I the SOB who does this. Do I think that your person XYZ who is conservative feels this way. I thought about this. This post will be posted one day or longer from when I wrote it so I can think on this. (February 19th) Liberals have never voted for a president who pushed Gay Marriage. A Social Issue. Abortion is a moral issue but it doesn’t have to do with sex. Or does it? Lets Cherry Pick the last Birth Control Issue I heard about. Giving Birth Control to Middle Schoolers in Maine with Sex Education. Or giving Sex Education to Elementary kids about Gay couples or even High Schoolers. These people have a common theme in general. They are not adults by law. Hmmm. So is our conservative’s sex issues just to tell people to stop haveing sex. Hmmm this sounds like a parenting issue. And should the parents tell their children about sex and when and when not to have sex the answer to social issues like STD’s and abortion. Is that the best solution? Is that an “ineffectual” solution because of our solution does not practically work. Sex Education of non adults aka kids, aka high schoolers, aka middle schoolers aka grade schoolers does work. So telling kids sex makes babies, works, and STD’s are common ,works, better then saying parents tell them no. Huh the only difference in the approach is what, the govenment states the facts or the parents do. Accept the govenment can’t teach the value of absence of sex. State Religion stuff don’t you know. Side note government teaching values is a state religion? Unless the parent don’t say anything because their parents didn’t say anything, then the state’s program is better then nothing. As a conservative, I say, can’t a private organization do better then that by teaching both in say a modular school system where parents or the kids if the parents allow choose the subjects of education. Really the Government is the best approach? This is classic conservative vs progressive idea. Some one slams us, we think about the charges and respond. And hence maybe think of a better solution suggestion then the liberal. Of course when the liberals come up with a solution because Conservatives slammed them usually Americans are pretty close to getting a solution. But that doesn’t happen. ( I just said O Really? huh I would love an exsample to prove me wrong. I just slammed liberals by the way.)

War! what is it good for? (music notes here) “In reality, rich people get politicians to start wars to gain better access to the resources of other nations ” Most Nations are willing to sell us stuff. Most nations who don’t aren’t doing it because of cost benefit analysis. They don’t because they happen to like power( they are evil) and they have an Anti American Veiw because of Racism or poverty class warfare reasons (mistaken or they are evil depending on how educated they aren’t ). So how does diplomacy fix things. It doesn’t in this situation most of the time they must be reasonable by definition, How does war fix things? We smash them to bedrock and try to help rebuild to build good will. This is not an optimal solution. Or we do nothing until “they” attack us or we do nothing and they ignore us while atrocities happen. War is to restore free will or genocide if they choose to fight us. No matter the path bad stuff is going to happen. So what won’t you complain about. So the smart people won’t latch onto a easy policy to avert war. Corporations think war is profitable in the long run. Remember CEO’s break down complex situations for a living. Are you saying these people are insulated from the war. That no one who runs the world don’t remember there own stays in the Army. Are you say the rich have forgotten the trials of the poor people? Kill the bourgeois! So who is going to do “The Job” they do. Why us common folk. We of the getto can do it better. Yes us Jews in the getto can do the business better until some one else throws us in the ovens. The the blacks will then have their turn. Black Power. Then the white Islamic peasents will revolt against the fat black Cats. See a pattern. We are Americans, did you still think Iraq is as simple as just oil. Or just profit. (at how much cost that lowers our dollars and bond ratings around the world.) Of course this is a complex situation someone may choose to do this. But all of We the People? The Majority? I would check your support base. Americans should agree with what I said because it has some/alot of truth. Americans should agree with Brain because? hey there are people who haven’t thought things through. Americans who has done more good for more people who didn’t have a voice. The Kurds remember their lives or the Shia Iraqs remeber them, or the Israel Jew. We supported them in there war for independence because we said never again in WW2. This is what war has brought us. If freedom is just an excuse for money, good. Should we remeber that money is not worth fighting for yes. Is it what we are fighting for in Iraq? What was our Intelligences saying then about the evil situation in Iraq. Was America alway a shining example? no but are we totaly greedy pigs who hate the poor and send them out to die in wars for profit and of course no elite in this country has ever had to work a day in their lives. Ridiculous. We the Peoples society is based on upward mobility. Or do you think there isn’t a chance of changing class without government help. I say just the opposite Government isn’t the solution to our problems Government is the problem. Do you really need all of my material referenced? Am I going to be accused of plagiarism? “O Really what the problem is?”

Serria Club

“The Sierra Club supports policies that advance sustainable development initiatives and address the root causes of environmental degradation, including poverty and lack of access to basic healthcare. Reducing global poverty is crucial to achieving long-term environmental sustainability.” Sierra Club

Agreed, wealth is intrinsically important to improveing conditions because that takes work.

Work is produced by energy over time. This costs money because money basically represents the inherent value of work produced.

Reducing poverty is important.

Now progressives like the Sierra Culb want to tax money from us and  give it to the UN to distribute to help poverty.  From the Gobal Poverty Act  834 Billion.  Great spend as much money as you want as long as we 1) have it to spend. This means the government has the cash from taxes in hand. You can’t barrow money to do this. Otherwise Government will not be responsible and we might end up with a 45 trillion dollar debt. 2) The taxes are not taxes on private wealth, income okay sales ok, not property tax. 3) Everybody pays. It is horse drake that only someone pays and everyone votes. 4) The taxes are reasonable, as in competitive with other economies. Like Eastern Europe, who countries have a flat tax  and governments are running surpluses.

We need a feedback system on our Government. If we don’t feel the sacrifice then we don’t get the blessings of being charitable. Also we have to chose to give. In other words if the poor don’t pay their token percentage then they have no incentive to reign in government spending.    If only the becoming rich pay then there is not enough incentive to become rich.   If only the already rich pay then the already rich move else where to where there is lower taxes. (note corporate leavings)    If  any of the above conditions aren’t met then the nation becomes poorer.   Hence there are less resources to give away for others benefit.

To reiterate we have to choose to give always even if it is a token percentage.  We have to work to receive  money.  Otherwise the American Values of Work Ethic go away.  And if we don’t see the person receiving the gift then we don’t gain anything from giving, and the ones that we serve don’t have any gratitude for receiving.   Then no one can be rich because the work ethic is gone and no one can receive help to make their work more effective because the rich are gone and then there is no love for the lack of gratitude and service.   This downward cycle is called a depression.

Our representatives should have a tax form that Itemizes things like these global charity’s. The only exceptions are defense, Government take what you need for an Military, and Roads. You notice a lot of people hate freedom around the world. Infrastructer is an investment the the government actually manages pretty well.   .

We should be able to voluntarily check a box on the Tax Form and pay more towards an endeavor, such as the Global Poverty Act. Till then Small Government. My Ideas for Charities; Student Loans (PerpetualEducationFund’s) and Grants. Ah HUD Houseing, Ah Health Care, maybe not depends on abuse issues, Ah welfare, nah workfare unless recipients  can’t work. Ah war torn African nations hmm stop the wars first and send over food in the mean time. R&D Yes (aka NASA DARPA)  Then again do you trust the Government to distribute these funds. Education ,Part Grant part loan. Yes Global Poverty act. No. XXY Yes XXXW No. Do you get the picture. Freedom to spend money is great. Technology like Alternative fuels in non ICEs will do wonders for our economic bottom line.

Not an involuntary  tax in there because we the people are chooseing. Capitalism is great isn’t. Imagine what low taxes would do to those donations.

Unfortunately this is not the system the Sierra Club wants. They want to increase taxes a lot and borrow lots of money because lots of taxes aren’t enough to fund their anti poverty improvements and they want to give the money to the UN. Can you say waste of resources that could have actually helped the environment or the economy or fuel cells or students or research. And best of all the Government just takes this while US citizens aren’t paying attention. Thank you Democrates. (they have current control of Congress)  Thank you Liberals like Nacey Pelos, Sierra Club, Kennedy, etc. More Condemnation to the latter. I think that most Democrats and Republicans are just asleep.

Common Sense

“. . . A long habit of not thinking a thing WRONG, gives it a superficial appearance of being RIGHT, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defense of custom. But the tumult soon subsides. Time makes more converts than reason.”

Socialism is an economic theory. Therefore we don’t think of it as wrong just a theory. By tradition the ghettos of America receive welfare. Socialistic welfare destroys work ethic hence a principle of God. A workfare system builds from a base a work ethic. Just like a PEF (perpetual educational fund) builds an educated base. A voucher system might bring a capitalistic example of how capitalism works.

It might even do better then the socialist system run by a majority of self proclaimed liberal teachers. I mean teaching work, the value of education, and captilism might be teaching values but so what. In less you claim values are a subset of religion therefore blocked by the first amendment because the government might teach part of a religion as a good thing. I know only two ways around that argument. First read what the founding fathers meant, not the supreme court (cause it was the supreme court that came up with the “wall”) , or take schooling and give it back to the parents. What parents, oh oh thats right traditional family’s that religion teaches about Mom and Dad and not having sex before being married those have contributed to the decline of the family for certain really poor groups who most need education so we can’t put it on the parents. So has crime degraded the economics of the poor and ultimately, I privately wonder if poor folks of the getto ever were exposed to the rural values of the American Dream.

But still it goes on and the ghettos are built on superficial appearance of the value, “America (government) helps it’s poor”. If you read literally, the last statement is even true in a way. But is that the right way?

Mile Post #23

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-05-28-federal-budget_N.htm

The above link says that our official deficit is $300 B. The modern accounting practices that congress doesn’t use, says that a more accurate picture is formed by insisting on deducting future debts now. So recalculate and a pay as you go system will cost us( The young people) $1.9 T The programs Social Secrutity and Medicare will kill us unless we (the young people) A) Have lots of Kids to have them pay the bills and shut down the program for them or B) Play for time, allow 3 percent of the social security and Medicare accounts taxes go to savings accounts, thus increasing money in the private sector and have a better economy help pay SOME of the Bill. Lower Taxes increase revenue for governments. Which means spending has to drop. or C) just take away benefits from me and my parents, ending the programs now. Really I think AARP just lost whatever of my or my parents business they ever had a chance of getting. Along with any one who spouts off LB Johnson’s drivel again. (LB is a president who changed SS and Medicare from FDR’s Plan (dare I say it?) “B” for those lacking history’s knowledge at their fingertips. Though you have the internet it should be easy enough to verify the names with the programs. Go work for your knowledge.) I should note that I believe “W” spouted off some of that drivel. Unfortunately so did Hillary, Obama, Edwards, Kerry, Gore,Pelosi, McCain, Shumer, Hagel just off the top of my head. So I guess my vote will go to those who advocate a boarder fence, I’ll even give them amnesty with a fine attached.