Whats the Problem.

Here’s a coment of mine to the post on The Angry African

I am going to edit this post as of Mar 13 and heres how my position has changed.  Prostitution is a crime.  He committed prostitution against the United States Government,  he is out.  His law licence should not be suspended.  I see no reason to make him a poor person.  Let him earn a living doing Wills and Incorporations.

Recap whats wrong here and whats evil.

Adultery was wrong. He was talking about the New York Scandal. To regulate scandals impeachment and trials by government is wrong. Unless you make Adultery Illegal. What do socialists and in this case the GOP doing, trying a crime that is not law.  Adultery is a politically incorrect thing to make illegal. Church and state and all that.

Islam is going to come in and say hey your system is broke try Sharia. They won’t go to the people. They will go to the socialists. They will promise the socialists what they want. Islam believes in being stewards of the Earth. Islam believes in humanism and working together with other religions. Am I telling the truth about Islam, yea. Are the Islamists telling the truth, yes. Where’s the catch, Sharia works like Sharia, Iran believes all these things, why don’t they give there people freedom? Believe it or not the USSR Constitution was like ours. Why the socialists, they control the schools. They control trade through regulations namely the EPA. So now the Government is the problem, again along with the enviromentalists.

Heres my comment

What he did was wrong. Should we kick him out because of it? Hmm Clinton didn’t get kicked out for a similar thing. However Clinton did lie under oath about it. Clinton should clearly be out. This guy hmm he told the truth. People make mistakes. Isn’t marriage an oath that ties this country together. Didn’t he break this oath. We don’t kick out a doctor when he something like this happens. Should we stay consistant here. I don’t like Frances system where anything goes. I don’t like the partial enforcement here. Either condemn adultery and fire everybody, condemn adultery and fire nobody, come up with some formula about who’s job is important and set up an enforcement agency and grow the govenment, or condone adultery as something two consenting adults can do.MY Opinion is the last two are unworkable. I believe God will withdraw his support of this nation for the last two under the law of hipocracy and the law of adultery respectively. The first two at least follow the law of justice and the law of forgiveness respectively. I don’t care what other nations do here we should set the example. I predict however that if you choose the second people will forget the forgivness we will have a plauge among us. Teens will not see a reason to keep sex sacred. Porn will run rampant because sex is not sacred. Abortions will go up because people will not want families with out commitments of a man and wife. I predict that this will hit the poor the hardest.

If the govenment get into the fray through Impeachment, trials, etc we will have public religious trials. And heaven help us if Islam gets into it. Christian’s for the most part will just throw you out. I would like to think we learned something from Spain’s inquisition, England’s religious interference with the Puritans. Palestinians ,Iran, Pakastain and suburbs of France and Londan are flirting with Sharia law.

I gotten a little far a field. But things tie together.
We have terrorists because they think they can get Sharia law around the world and the rest of the world will die.

been nothing but mild compared to most.

Quote Unquote. Have you looked at the substance of what these candidates are saying. Mild, pictures of Obama in Muslim Garb . I am going to say it. I have never heard any evidence that Obama is Muslim. The Democrats are tar and feather themselves. The dirty tricks are amazing and the misunderstand of what a promoted policy will do is staggering. Its simple you want to fight terrorist use the military and their tribunals. You want to save money don’t send our miltary out. One or the other. Be in Iraq or not. If not, accept that there will be massive violence. If so, hold out some hope that our military can give them breathing space at approx 300 billion a year plus a 70 billion in ammo or new humvees trailar park type homes (tents get old and have no AC). Some of which was foreign aid. Probably what it would cost in Darfur or if we would have fought in Somilia. We are fighting the same Islamist who are trying to take over everwhere. Islamists are pro sharia law.

Side note : Islamists not Muslim. Muslims are benign harmless creatures called normal people, favoring pray five times a day in search of self improvement. Islamist wants to tell you how to live through big govenments with guns. Lets call them progressives with a frowny face. Is that a reference to liberal fascism, yep. Progressive lose the guns and smile. Problem is you don’t know which one is which until they are in power.

It is simple you want energy build refinerys. Coal to Oil. drill in Alaska, drill off California. Government has to insure the Coal glasification to be economically viable. Otherwise the Saudias will drop oil prices below the level.

We can afford something or we can’t and cannot add any programs.

However anytime someone states that it is ethier/ or I perceive that they are rolling their eyes “conservatives”.   Followed by the thought that nothing is ethier/ or.   They’re free to come up with an alternative but they don’t.  I just don’t ‘get it’  but no one explains “it” to me.   When I find someone who does, I think about it.  I don’t respond immediately and I may point out a small flaw or two for devils advocate and then I make up my mind. Until the next point.

The arguments I Hear are Baseless ” I don’t know if…, but I hear that he might be …”     If you call this mild I’ll disagree, point out your not paying attention, and call it blatant election engineering.

To Quote King’s Funeral

“If any man is authorized to take away my life because he thinks and says I am a false teacher, then, upon the same principle, we should be justified in taking away the life of every false teacher; and where would be the end of blood? and who would not be the sufferer?”

Radicals should remember that. I point my finger to the unforgiving man of the Middle East because of recent past history. The end of blood in the middle east, yea right. Those “men” also give out Humanitarian service and aid to the poor. So they may use the masses for cover.

The one thing I fear is that the United States will commit genocide in the middle east, after we stand our ground after we are attacked again. We can do it. We will do it if and only if a nuclear weapon is used against us. I just don’t have any faith that those idiots in Iran understand that. I do have faith that the UN , and political elements in the US will allow them to have a nuclear weapon. After all we can’t know that there civilian program is just that. We are always threatened with destruction usually with adjectives like udder, total, and such like.

Yea we can and would hammer Iran, we do to a certain extent now. The UN isn’t happy with us for that. The reason we don’t truly kill the country is simple. How many virtues are in that city of Persia that would condem us if we did before were forced. Will Iran force our hand make us farmers and craftsmen and priest and pastors and housewives and yes even our CEOs and laywers and politicians stand up and say Iran truly is run by mad men who will destroy the world.