“We don’t want to punish them with babies” but aparently he’s now against Partially Birth Abortion. So which is it. Who cares, he is just another careerist in Washington.
NAFTA, Obama was going to abandon NAFTA, but that was overheated talk.
So what should we push as America, Energy. Lets keep on congress to drill off shore and in Anwar and shale oil in the rockies.
Obama wants to fast tracks new alternitive fuels. Why not Fast Track New Oil we have the parts already.
Quote Unquote. Have you looked at the substance of what these candidates are saying. Mild, pictures of Obama in Muslim Garb . I am going to say it. I have never heard any evidence that Obama is Muslim. The Democrats are tar and feather themselves. The dirty tricks are amazing and the misunderstand of what a promoted policy will do is staggering. Its simple you want to fight terrorist use the military and their tribunals. You want to save money don’t send our miltary out. One or the other. Be in Iraq or not. If not, accept that there will be massive violence. If so, hold out some hope that our military can give them breathing space at approx 300 billion a year plus a 70 billion in ammo or new humvees trailar park type homes (tents get old and have no AC). Some of which was foreign aid. Probably what it would cost in Darfur or if we would have fought in Somilia. We are fighting the same Islamist who are trying to take over everwhere. Islamists are pro sharia law.
Side note : Islamists not Muslim. Muslims are benign harmless creatures called normal people, favoring pray five times a day in search of self improvement. Islamist wants to tell you how to live through big govenments with guns. Lets call them progressives with a frowny face. Is that a reference to liberal fascism, yep. Progressive lose the guns and smile. Problem is you don’t know which one is which until they are in power.
It is simple you want energy build refinerys. Coal to Oil. drill in Alaska, drill off California. Government has to insure the Coal glasification to be economically viable. Otherwise the Saudias will drop oil prices below the level.
We can afford something or we can’t and cannot add any programs.
However anytime someone states that it is ethier/ or I perceive that they are rolling their eyes “conservatives”. Followed by the thought that nothing is ethier/ or. They’re free to come up with an alternative but they don’t. I just don’t ‘get it’ but no one explains “it” to me. When I find someone who does, I think about it. I don’t respond immediately and I may point out a small flaw or two for devils advocate and then I make up my mind. Until the next point.
The arguments I Hear are Baseless ” I don’t know if…, but I hear that he might be …” If you call this mild I’ll disagree, point out your not paying attention, and call it blatant election engineering.
We need to get off of foreign oil. I don’t want Exxon to pay for Oil from the middle east. How? We need a source here. What source do we have that could take over that much energy locked up in those barrels. We have off shore California , we have offshore Florida (China is drilling sideways from Cuba to get it. ) We have off shore Alaska / Top of the world (Russia wants those). We need to build those Oil Rigs even if there with in land sight. Currently banned by the State because the Serria Club and citizens who support groups like it were load. “GET YOUR OIL ELSEWHERE” All inland sources are in wilderness area. (huh people don’t live there.) And tied up simularly. I saying financial there won’t be anyone complaining when we see how deep in debt we are to Saudi Arabia. So see it. Coal Glasification will work if the government loans the money to an insure that the Oil Companies investment in those 20 billion dollar plants. Oh and the Government has to declare an emergency to do it. Or Congress also has to limit liability from environmental law suits. Nuclear can provide the energy for glasification. Or the energy to compress hydrogen and create hydrogen. Those are the choices until celliouse ethanol goes commercial. Those are the cost effective options.
Don’t give me objections based on CO2. There irrelevant. We want to survie with our current economic power and we need to have that power or bad things happen to millions of people who the threat of our military keeps safe. Think Europe. Think of us being attacked or bought as slaves. Think of how much aid we(not the US government, we the people) give to Africa, Indonisea. Our Nations money is worth less and less because the government spends to much and because Exxon Spends to much on Foreign Oil. Cananda’s oil sands could keep us afloat for a bit. I hope.
Don’t give me objections based on the environment. If Exxon owns the land it should build those plants on it. Be it on the rocky mountains or near the everglades. I prefer it be next to a coal mine and away from a city and near a rail way for the coal.
Montana and Idaho wants them. Give them it.
Our ability to own a home in California or Florida depends on it.
Categories: Energy · Global Warming · Serria Club
